Snap-on Passive Retro-Reflective Markers
Useful when your mounting logic is snap-on rather than threaded and you want a different attachment style.
Open product pageThreaded Marker Interface Fit
Threaded Tracking Markers For Interface Fit And System Boundaries
When a surgical tracking components supplier conversation and a medical device components manufacturer conversation land on the same marker, the next step is simple: confirm the threaded post, the 13 mm sphere, and the research-use boundary before you shortlist the part.
AIMOOE presents this No.002 marker as a single-use, sterile passive sphere for wireless tracking context. It is not framed as a blanket fit promise, so the interface check stays in your hands.
13 mm sphereSize, not thread pitch
No.002Variant shown on page
Threaded mountCheck host instrument post
Research-purposeNot intended for medical applications
Interface fit starts here
The sphere size is only one part of the review. The threaded post, host instrument geometry, and the role you need the marker to play must line up before the part becomes a practical option.
Interface Fit Map
Read The Part Like A Mounting Problem
This page is built for the buyer who already knows the part belongs in a tracking workflow and now needs to decide whether the interface is right.
- 1. Confirm the sphere size. The page shows a 13 mm passive marker sphere, which sets the visual and dimensional expectation for the part.
- 2. Check the threaded post. The threaded design means the host instrument's thread geometry, engagement depth, and post shape matter more than a generic label.
- 3. Keep the system language in its lane. Wireless tracking and Brainlab wording provide context, but they do not replace a fit review for your own instrument.
- 4. Keep the boundary visible. The product page presents the component as research-purpose and says it is not intended for medical applications, so approval should stay conservative.
Component And System Boundary
Keep The Marker Role Separate From The Full Workflow
| Visible marker detail | Why it matters | What your team should still verify |
|---|---|---|
| 13 mm sphere | Sets the size expectation for the visible marker body. | Thread pitch, engagement depth, and the clearance around the host post. |
| Threaded design | Shows that the interface is a mount, not a generic clip-on fit. | Whether the instrument uses the same thread family and assembly logic. |
| No.002 marker | Gives the variant name buyers can reference in a BOM or RFQ. | Any internal naming convention used by your team. |
| Research-purpose component | Keeps the page from overstating medical use or clinical outcomes. | Your own application review, compliance review, and destination market rules. |
| Wireless tracking / Brainlab context | Places the part inside the right equipment conversation without turning it into a blanket system promise. | The exact instrument, workflow, and assembly point you are matching. |
Related AIMOOE Components
Compare Nearby Component Families
These cards help you keep the threaded marker in context with other AIMOOE parts, without confusing one mounting logic for another.
Optical Positioning Tools
A different component family for positioning workflows when the marker itself is not the only item in scope.
Open product page
AIMOOE WorkStation
Helpful for the surrounding setup and workflow conversation, not for replacing the marker's mounting decision.
Open product pageThree Decision Readings
Use These Reads To Narrow The Choice
Each note below is tied to a real AIMOOE article and stays focused on a different buyer decision.
Lock The Marker Role Before You Compare System Names
Use this read when you need to separate the passive marker sphere from the larger tracking conversation before you decide on the part.
Open articleKeep Sphere, Marker, And Navigation Terms In Order
This is the right read when you want the label hierarchy to stay clean while you review the marker inside a navigation workflow.
Open articleCheck The Threaded Interface Before You Approve The Match
Start here when the next question is whether the host post, the thread geometry, and the 13 mm sphere work together.
Open articleFAQ
Six Questions Buyers Usually Ask
What does the threaded design change for fit checking?
It shifts the first decision from general marker shape to the host instrument's thread geometry and engagement depth. That is why the interface check matters before you treat the part as a match.
What does 13 mm tell me about this marker?
The 13 mm figure tells you the sphere size. It does not tell you the thread pitch, post diameter, or any other mounting detail.
Why is the Brainlab wording not treated as a blanket compatibility promise?
It gives system context, but the final fit still depends on the host instrument and its mounting details. The page keeps that boundary visible so you can review the part carefully.
What should I ask for before I approve the marker on a bill of materials?
Ask for the thread geometry, engagement depth, post dimensions, the intended use context, and any other mounting notes your team relies on during approval.
Is this part presented as a medical-use device?
No. The product page presents it as a research-purpose component and says it is not intended for medical applications.
Where can I continue the conversation or ask for the product page?
Use the product page for the current part and the contact page for follow-up questions or a quote-style conversation.
